Job listings for historians on, 2013-16

Brodie Waddell

Every year, universities across Britain and beyond place hundreds of advertisements on seeking to appoint historians to academic posts. Although accessing this data is not easy and analysing is far from straightforward, recent listings do provide some potentially useful information about the state of the academic job market for historians.

In my previous posts on jobs, I have focused primarily on the ‘supply side’ of the equation – how many people are completing PhDs each year and how that is changing. It is much more difficult to get hard data on the ‘demand side’ – i.e. jobs available – though I’ve tried various proxies such as the numbers of historians with university posts or the number of incoming history undergraduates. The cohort studies of Warwick and Cambridge PhDs allowed me to link doctorates to academic posts more directly, but that was only a small and probably unrepresentative sample.

New data and methodology

The advertisements on allow us to get a better sense of how many jobs are actually listed in a given year. Unfortunately, these listings and their urls disappear as soon as the advert expires, making it very difficult to collect details over an extended period. However, John Morgan – currently Economic History Society Power Fellow at the Institute of Historical Research – has an RSS feed of these jobs going back to May 2013. He very kindly scraped the infomation and put it into an excel file, which he shared with me. This is the raw file. As John notes:

the data don’t cover your whole period, and not all of the interesting information is preserved (the way my reader handles xml seems to have changed over time, meaning quite a lot of salary data is missing). I also have no way of knowing whether my reader missed any adverts in the past – I assume it hasn’t, but can’t know this. But there are 2,677 ads listed here. They still need sorting in the way you mention in your post – it’s a mishmash of PhD positions, postdocs, hourly paid jobs, etc. – but it might be of interest to go through at some point.

I’ve gone through the raw data and done some simple trimming and sorting. I removed all the listings that I could find that were pre-PhD posts, such as MA and PhD studentships. Although I may have missed a couple, I believe essentially all of the remaining listings are post-PhD posts. I then attempted to figure out which ones were temporary or fixed-term posts. This is more difficult and necessarily incomplete as many job listings do not include this information in their titles, which is all I have access to. Thus, some of the unspecified ‘lectureships’ that are here counted as possible ‘permanent’ posts are actually temporary. So, in what follows the figures for ‘permanent’ posts should be taken as maximums and those for ‘temporary’ are minimums.

I also attempted to sort the posts into academic years (September to August), so as to make them comparable to my other figures discussed in earlier posts. This means that there is data from four academic years, but that the first (2012-13) and last (2015-16) are only partial. This is the cleaned and sorted file.

Another problem is the incompleteness of the data. I believe that the vast majority of UK academic posts are advertised on, but there are sure to be a few that are not.

Results: hundreds of jobs, but fewer permanent

So, what does the new data tell us? There were 725 adverts for post-PhD jobs in history in 2013-14 and 814 adverts in 2014-15. Of these, a maximum of 394 (54%) in 2013-14 and 475 (58%) in 2014-15 were for permanent posts, though as noted above these are undoubtedly over-estimates.

Adverts for posts in history

So, in those two years there were an average of 769 posts advertised per annum. This seems like an encouragingly large number at first glance. However, the implications for the academic job market are actually rather worrisome for recent PhDs seeking permanent academic posts, because this dramatically overstates the number of positions available.

The first problem is temporary posts. As noted above, only an average of 435 per year (about 55% of the total) might be permanent posts. I would guess that at least another 10-20% of the unspecified posts are actually temporary, leaving at most 350-400 truly permanent posts. Although many of the hundreds of temporary posts are a necessary part of academic life – both for universities and for early career historians – each will be filled by someone who will simply be looking for a permanent post again a year or two later. Therefore, over the medium-term, competition for permanent posts is unaffected by the number of temporary posts available in any given year.

The second problem is ‘churn’, that is to say people moving from one permanent post to another. For example, if a Chair in Medieval History is advertised, that post is likely to be filled by someone who already has a permanent post, whose previous position will then (usually) be replaced, thus leading to another advert. In such situations, will list two adverts, but there will really only be one new job. In the spreadsheet, I found 34 ‘chairs’ and 19 ‘readers’ advertised, almost all of which will be filled by someone with an existing permanent post. There were also a couple hundred other ‘professor’ posts advertised, though many of those were ‘assistant’ or ‘associate’. My guess would be that at least fifty posts per year are filled through ‘churn’ and thus these posts don’t really ‘count’ towards the total jobs actually available. That reduces the number to perhaps 300-350 permanent jobs available each year.

The final problem is the large number of PhDs completed each year. In these two years, there were on average 652 doctorates in history granted per annum. Even with the very generous estimates above, that means that there is only about one permanent job for every two new PhDs. Personally, I suspect that the adjustments I’ve made are likely to be substantially too optimistic and the real figure is closer to one job per three PhDs, but closer analysis would be needed to prove this.

Adverts for posts in history, adjusted

For now, I will simply say that the data from suggest that there are many job opportunities available for new historians, but that the prospects for a permanent career in this field are much more restricted. There must be a subtantial gap between the number of people who are able to find temporary posts after finishing a PhD and those able to secure long-term academic employment.


I am extremely grateful to John Morgan for providing the raw data for the post above. If anyone has an RSS subscription to ‘history’ posts on that goes back earlier than May 2012, please let me know.

Also, just to get a sense of the seasonality of adverts, I did a quick chart based on my own weekly data for 2015-16. This data is very messy – e.g. it includes studentships – but it at least provides a basic overview of the year to date.

Adverts for history, by week

Finally, as I have said in a previous posts, we must also remember that many people do PhDs without the intention of going into an academic career. We should not simply assume that academic jobs for new PhDs are a ‘Good Thing’. We should not neglect the contributions of people with historical training to non-academic fields (e.g. ‘alt-ac’ jobs) and the value of doctoral study to people from all walks of life, irrespective of their career goals. In fact, I hope that this post will push people to think harder about the problem with equating PhDs with academic careers.

[Update: 12/04/2015]

Andy Burn (Durham) used the spreadsheet to do a bit more analysis and came up with very useful information.

First, he worked out a much more accurate and detailed pattern of the seasonality of history listings on He found that ‘permanent’ jobs tended to be advertised in the spring (mostly February to May) and ‘temporary’ posts were usually advertised later (May to July). There are exceptions, but useful to know if you are planning and preparing job applications.Andy Burn - seasonality of jobs advets chart


This information about seasonality is also useful as it allowed Andy to project forward from our current 2015-16 data (which only goes to February 2016) to estimate the total listings for the whole year. According to his projection, there will be 856 adverts in 2015-16, of which a maximum of 571 will be permanent. This is an increase of 5.2% and 20.3% respectively. That certainly seems like good news, though we don’t have the figures for new PhDs for this academic year, so we don’t yet know if the number of people competing for these jobs increased too.

Andy Burn - jobs projection 2015-16



14 thoughts on “Job listings for historians on, 2013-16

  1. Assistant and Associate Professorships are North American terms. Assistant Professor is roughly equivalent to Lecture and Associate Prof roughly equivalent to reader (sorry, if I am telling you something you already know but from your text it seemed as though you counted those as UK jobs). Are you able to check the location or university that advertise such positions? I suspect it may not affect the numbers as you already estimated them out as churn jobs. Also, have you considered looking at the HESA data for new hires in History. It might be able to give you more precise numbers than job adverts but maybe not as there are some issues with rounding.

    • Thanks, Doug. Yes, I know those are normally North American terms, though some British unis have started using them. In my spreadsheet there are 220 listings with ‘professor’ in the title. 151 of these are from 2013-14 or 2014-15, i.e. about 10% of the total adverts. Most of these are foreign, but they also include some that are British professorships (15-20 per year) and some that actually lectureships at British universities (10-15 per year). LSE, Swansea, Nottingham and Warwick all use the ‘assistant/associate professor’ terminology in their adverts. So, overall it doesn’t affect my estimates above of the total jobs available by more than 5% to 10%.

      Regarding the HESA numbers, I used them in my previous posts to compare the annual percentage increase in university-based historians to the annual increase in PhDs. I decided index these to track change over time rather than trying to use these numbers to estimate actual new posts because I was worried that retirements, etc., would skew the results too much.

      I was very impressed with your recent analysis of archaeology jobs and PhDs ( Particularly useful was your response to some of the comments on your analysis about the ‘export’ of British PhDs and about the number of PhDs who don’t intend to go into academia. These are questions that have come up on some of my previous posts. However, as you say:

      ‘The DISCO projects show that there is very little mobility across European Archaeology (Aitchison, et al. 2014). Those that do cross borders tend do so in small numbers and the exchanges run both ways. Between the UK and the United States there is almost an equal exchange of archaeologists working ‘across the pond’ in academia (Rocks-Macqueen 2011, Rocks-Macqueen 2012). While there are many advantages to an exchange of scholars the relief of the job market is not one of them; the UK is not a significant exporter of PhDs. Not all PhD students dream of jobs in academia, but as raised in the lead paper 80–90% of PhD students have aspirations of academia. A few people finding jobs in foreign Universities or a few not interested in academia is not going to significantly increase odds when the UK produces roughly 200 PhDs per year.’

      • I had not realised those terms hard started to migrate over. Those universities don’t really have archaeology so not on my radar. Apologies for that.

        HESA- sorry, I should have been more specific. If you have access to the HESA HEIDI database, which has the raw data, one of the datasets is leavers and starters with destinations so you can know if people are switching jobs and how many new jobs there are. Though HESA data tends to be rounded to the nearest five so it misses small changes. For archaeology it was not accurate enough but it might be for history but I am not sure about that.

        Glad you found my article useful. It was actually someone who read it that pointed me to this article on twitter.

  2. Pingback: Week in Review – 16 April « Freya Gowrley

  3. Pingback: The Advice You Didn’t Ask For | williamgpooley

  4. From a reliable informant who wishes to remain anonymous: A recently advertised nine-month teaching fellowship in early modern British/European history received 77 applications. ‘All qualified.’

    • I applied for a one year research asst post in London in mid-2016. They had just short of 200 applicants, and it required a PhD!

  5. Pingback: Life After the PhD | williamgpooley

  6. Pingback: On academic ambivalence towards public history | Catherine Fletcher

  7. I love the article! I work at and do a great deal of data analytics in hope to provide some useful information to our audience. It’s fascinating to see how you have managed to access this data in a very resourceful way. Indeed, is a very rich source of UK HE employment data, but it is not without its challenges. Access to this data is one of them. Another challenge is in how we categorise our adverts – this could mean that some adverts have been missed off of your list. Also, it may be worth noting that some of the adverts may be recruiting for multiple people, this is particularly true for PhD positions. I believe that, in terms of employment for PhD qualified historians, or indeed any other PhD qualified people, the real challenge is in defining the career paths outside of the academia, as you rightly pointed out in your article.

    • Thanks, Martina – I’m really pleased to hear that from someone who works at Your points about the issues of catagorisation and multiple posts within one advert are good ones that I’ll need to keep in mind in the future.

      I’m hoping to soon go back and put together an update post with the latest data. I don’t have time do that immediately, but hopefully in the next couple months. Would you (or someone else at be able to provide some of this data for us in a more direct way (rather than scraping it from a RSS feed)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s